Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Private Schools vs. Public Schools in Athletics


Bishop McDevitt football dominates District 3 football.
           There is a current struggle in high school sports that need to be addressed.  The public vs. private school sports battle is a real issue that must be taken care of.  Private schools are given the right to recruit, kids may go to their school that live out of the district, and they are typically better funded than public schools.  This issue has been noticed and addressed by states nationwide.


First of all, there are many states that have not had a true issue with this so they have not made any laws or rules to plan against it.  In other states, the private schools and public schools compete in separate bodies of athletics and have different state championships.  This works well in tearing down the boundaries that separate the two teams so that they will not have to compete against each other.  Other states use a multiplier which makes the school multiply their population size by a certain amount because they are private.  This multiplier makes the state championships more competitive because the private schools must move up in classifications and compete against bigger schools with a lot more students. 

                The pros of keeping the schools together in the state championships is that then the state will have a true state champion and everyone competes in the state.  The schools will be able to create rivalries and maintain a strong competition throughout playoffs.  And if private schools are allowed to play public schools, than travel for private schools would be less because there are more public schools in a small density. 

                
              The cons of keeping the schools together in the state championships is the domination of private schools throughout playoffs.  The private schools are allowed to recruit players and provide financial aid to students that would like to come to their school for athletics.  Many private schools are run like colleges in how they draw players to come to their school with the lure of a competitive team, nice facilities/gear, and a high-class education.  The private schools that I have seen in our area recruit players from out of their jurisdiction just to have the most competitive athletes possible.  For example, Bishop McDevitt has won the 3A District championship 6 years in a row, while having players from Harrisburg, Central Dauphin, Central Dauphin East, Susquehanna Township, Bermudian Springs, Cedar Cliff, Mechanicsburg, and other schools in the area.  Another dominant private school in the area is York Catholic in girls’ basketball because they have won the 2A District championship 11 years in a row.  These schools recruit people from around their area in order to give themselves the best teams possible, while public schools are at a disadvantage because they are not allowed to recruit players.

                My stand on this issue is that the private schools and public schools should be split up and not compete against each other.  The private schools are too dominant in state championships and they are a huge disadvantage to public schools who do not get to have the same rights as private schools.  At worst, there should be a multiplier to force schools to move up classifications and make the competitions more competitive for everyone.  Private schools have too many advantages over public schools to be in competition with them.  


Sources:

http://www.athleticbusiness.com/demand-to-close-gap-between-public-non-public-schools-increases.html

http://www.rrstar.com/article/20120614/Blogs/306149895

http://highschoolsports.cleveland.com/news/article/-4000324031846785879/ohsaas-competitive-balance-referendum-the-latest-round-in-a-national-fight-between-public-and-private-schools/

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/113694-high-school-sports-private-vs-public

No comments:

Post a Comment