Friday, September 25, 2015

The Globalization of Basketball





          The globalization of basketball is a huge change that will better the sport greatly.  As of right now, soccer is the most famous sport in the entire world.  The amount of viewers that tune into the World Cup and the crowds that come out to see soccer games is incredible.  Basketball is looking to gain this much acclaim and power in the world.  The developments that are helping this cause are the outreach and power of the NBA.  The NBA is reaching out to countries like Canada, many countries in Africa, and Mexico.  The National Basketball League is the premier basketball league in the entire world and every basketball player across the country would like to play in this league.  Many times players will become the best and most respectable players in their own home country’s leagues before moving to the NBA to get the best pay possible.  Players like Dirk Nowitzki, Serge Ibaka, and Yao Ming, have been huge in helping to bring the NBA to their respectable countries and spread it across the world.  Every kid from across the world have people they look up to and if these people are playing in the NBA, then these kids will want to watch the NBA and their favorite player play.  The expansion of basketball in the world is evident whenever somebody famous like Kobe Bryant goes to visit another country and gets huge groups of people wanting to see him.  Kobe Bryant’s influence in China is huge still to this day.


         One of the reasons why basketball has begun to grow so quickly across the world is because of how cheap it is and where you can play it.  It is easy to build a basketball hoop in an area, whether it’s on concrete, dirt, or a wood floor.  The court does not take up that much space and even then, a full court is not needed to enjoy basketball games.  Whenever a sport can be played in a poor environment, that sport will be able to touch many people across the country, rich or poor. 
          A large place where basketball has skyrocketed is in China.  There are over a billion people in China and these people are being influenced largely by Chinese players having successful careers in the NBA, like Yao Ming and Jeremy Lin.  Whenever young kids see players like this being successful, they look up to them and want to play basketball.  Another large place of basketball globalization is in Africa.  Players like Serge Ibaka and Hakeem Olajuwon have helped largely to influence the spread of affordable basketball hoops and balls in these areas.  The NBA also played their first game ever in Africa over the summer, in which it was Team Africa vs.  Team World.  Another large place that basketball growth has been shown is in areas of Canada, especially Toronto.  Ever since the NBA decided to move up north and give Canada a chance to have large growth of the sport.  Players like Andrew Wiggins, Anthony Bennett, and Steve Nash show the power of basketball in Canada.  Also, there has been a large influx of players from other countries to come to America prep basketball schools in order to better their skills.  Players from all over the country will move to America with the power of their basketball skills and have a shot at a very good education and a chance at making the NBA.    


Sources:



Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Private Schools vs. Public Schools in Athletics


Bishop McDevitt football dominates District 3 football.
           There is a current struggle in high school sports that need to be addressed.  The public vs. private school sports battle is a real issue that must be taken care of.  Private schools are given the right to recruit, kids may go to their school that live out of the district, and they are typically better funded than public schools.  This issue has been noticed and addressed by states nationwide.


First of all, there are many states that have not had a true issue with this so they have not made any laws or rules to plan against it.  In other states, the private schools and public schools compete in separate bodies of athletics and have different state championships.  This works well in tearing down the boundaries that separate the two teams so that they will not have to compete against each other.  Other states use a multiplier which makes the school multiply their population size by a certain amount because they are private.  This multiplier makes the state championships more competitive because the private schools must move up in classifications and compete against bigger schools with a lot more students. 

                The pros of keeping the schools together in the state championships is that then the state will have a true state champion and everyone competes in the state.  The schools will be able to create rivalries and maintain a strong competition throughout playoffs.  And if private schools are allowed to play public schools, than travel for private schools would be less because there are more public schools in a small density. 

                
              The cons of keeping the schools together in the state championships is the domination of private schools throughout playoffs.  The private schools are allowed to recruit players and provide financial aid to students that would like to come to their school for athletics.  Many private schools are run like colleges in how they draw players to come to their school with the lure of a competitive team, nice facilities/gear, and a high-class education.  The private schools that I have seen in our area recruit players from out of their jurisdiction just to have the most competitive athletes possible.  For example, Bishop McDevitt has won the 3A District championship 6 years in a row, while having players from Harrisburg, Central Dauphin, Central Dauphin East, Susquehanna Township, Bermudian Springs, Cedar Cliff, Mechanicsburg, and other schools in the area.  Another dominant private school in the area is York Catholic in girls’ basketball because they have won the 2A District championship 11 years in a row.  These schools recruit people from around their area in order to give themselves the best teams possible, while public schools are at a disadvantage because they are not allowed to recruit players.

                My stand on this issue is that the private schools and public schools should be split up and not compete against each other.  The private schools are too dominant in state championships and they are a huge disadvantage to public schools who do not get to have the same rights as private schools.  At worst, there should be a multiplier to force schools to move up classifications and make the competitions more competitive for everyone.  Private schools have too many advantages over public schools to be in competition with them.  


Sources:

http://www.athleticbusiness.com/demand-to-close-gap-between-public-non-public-schools-increases.html

http://www.rrstar.com/article/20120614/Blogs/306149895

http://highschoolsports.cleveland.com/news/article/-4000324031846785879/ohsaas-competitive-balance-referendum-the-latest-round-in-a-national-fight-between-public-and-private-schools/

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/113694-high-school-sports-private-vs-public